Valoración inmunológica en la detección de la infección perioperatoria en pacientes intervenidos por cáncer de colon

  1. Francisca Moreno Racionero 1
  2. María Bedate Núñez 1
  3. Beatriz De Andrés Asenjo 1
  4. Juan Beltrán de Heredia y Rentería 1
  5. Ana Patricia Legido Morán 1
  6. Jesús Francisco Bermejo Martín 1
  7. José Máximo Rabadan Jimenez 1
  1. 1 Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia
    info

    Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia

    Palencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02atpex25

Revista:
Anales de la Real Academia de Medicina y Cirugía de Valladolid

ISSN: 0210-6523

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 56

Páginas: 345-378

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24197/ARAMCV.56.2020.345-378 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de la Real Academia de Medicina y Cirugía de Valladolid

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Objetivos: Evaluar la utilidad de la cuantificación en la concentración de leucocitos y subpoblaciones linfocitarias en sangre para identificar la presencia de fuga anastomótica, en pacientes intervenidos de cáncer de colon, incluso antes de la aparición de síntomas clínicos. Método: Estudio prospectivo observacional que consiste en extraer diferentes muestras de sangre el día previo a la intervención, a las 24 horas, 72 horas y 120 horas post-cirugía, para determinar las subpoblaciones linfocitarias en pacientes que requirieron una intervención quirúrgica programada de cáncer de colon. Resultados: Se analizaron 62 enfermos intervenidos de cáncer de colon durante un periodo de 22 meses, de los cuales 7 pacientes presentaron fuga anastomótica, observándose que presentar ≤ 379 células/mm3 de LTCD4 a las 72 horas de la cirugía indicaba un riesgo de fuga anastomótica de 19,7 veces más respecto de aquellos que tienen cifras superiores (p=0,025). Conclusión: La monitorización de las subpoblaciones linfocitarias y más concretamente de los LTCD4 durante el periodo perioperatorio en el cáncer de colon puede servir para detectar de manera precoz la presencia de fuga anastomótica.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • C. Pierrakos, J.L. Vincent. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical Care, 14 (2010), pp. R15
  • Faix JD. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2013;50(1):23–36.
  • Hofer N, Zacharias E, Müller W, Resch B. An update on the use of C-reactive protein in early-onset neonatal sepsis: current insights and new tasks. Neonatology. 2012;102(1):25–36.
  • Vincent JL, Dufaye P, Berré J, Leeman M, Degaute JP, Kahn RJ. Serial lactate determinations during circulatory shock. Crit Care Med. 1983;11(6):449–51.
  • Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon JM., Cavaillon JM. Septic shock. Lancet. 2005;365(9453):63–78.
  • Spec A, Shindo Y, Burnham CA, Wilson S, Ablordeppey EA, Beiter ER, et al. T cells from patients with Candida sepsis display a suppressive immunophenotype. Crit Care. 2016;20; 20:15.
  • Sharma A, Yang WL, Matsuo S, Wang P. Differential alterations of tissue T-cell subsets after sepsis. Immunol Lett. 168(1):41–50.
  • Cabrera-Perez J, Condotta SA, Badovinac VP, Griffith TS. Impact of sepsis on CD4 T cell immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96(5):767–77.
  • Busani S, Damiani E, Gavazzuti I, Donati I, Girardis M. Intravenous immunoglobulin in septic shock: review of the mechanisms of action and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;82(5):559–72.
  • Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 88(9):1157–68.
  • Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Cleary RK. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(5):569–75.
  • Brisinda G, Rating S, Cadeddu F, Mazzeo P. Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(2):269–78.
  • Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H; Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 12(1):37–43.
  • Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. 202(3):439–44.
  • McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):462–79.
  • Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM. Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg. 2010;145(4):371–6.
  • Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(5):653–60.
  • Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW. Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(11):1719–25.
  • Richards CH, Campbell V, Ho C, Hayes J, Elliott T, Thompson-Fawcett M. Smoking is a major risk factor for anastomotic leak in patients undergoing low anterior resection. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(5):628–33.
  • Kim MJ, Shin R, Oh HK, Park JW, Jeong SY, Park JG. The impact of heavy smoking on anastomotic leakage and stricture after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. World J Surg. 2011;35(12):2806–10.
  • Moutschen MP, Scheen AJ, Lefebvre PJ. Impaired immune responses in diabetes mellitus: analysis of the factors and mechanisms involved. Relevance to the increased susceptibility of diabetic patients to specific infections. Diabete Metab. 1992;18(3):187–201.
  • Gallacher SJ, Thomson G, Fraser WD, Fisher BM, Gemmell CG, MacCuish AC. Neutrophil bactericidal function in diabetes mellitus: evidence for association with blood glucose control. Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc. 1995;12(10):916–20.
  • Biondo S, Parés D, Kreisler E, Ragué JM, Fraccalvieri D, Ruiz AG, et al. Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(12):2272–80.
  • A. P. Meagher FRACS; S. Yang MD, PhD; S. Li MD. Is it right to ignore learning‐curve patients? Laparoscopic colorectal trials. ANZ J Surg. 2017; 87:898-902.
  • Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(12):1300–10.
  • Ichikawa N, Homma S, Yoshida T, Ohno Y, Kawamura H, Kamiizumi Y, et al. Supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):436–442 doi: 10.1007/ s00464-017-5701-Z
  • Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, et al. Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage and Long-Term Survival After Colorectal Surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(8):2890.
  • Ramanathan ML, MacKay G, Platt J, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The impact of open versus laparoscopic resection for colon cancer on C-reactive protein concentrations as a predictor of postoperative infective complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):938–43.
  • Almeida AB, Faria G, Moreira H, Pinto-de-Sousa J, Correia-da-Silva P, Maia JC. Elevated serum C-reactive protein as a predictive factor for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg. 2012;10(2):87–91.
  • MacKay GJ, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ. C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infective complications following elective colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(5):583–7.
  • Fujii T, Tabe Y, Yajima R, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, Kuwano H. Relationship between C-reactive protein levels and wound infections in elective colorectal surgery: C-reactive protein as a predictor for incisional SSI. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58((107-108)):752–5.
  • Kang BU, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Choi WC, Choi YG. Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: detection and management based on serial C-reactive protein measurements. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(2):158–64.
  • Kjelland CB, Djogovic D. The role of serum lactate in the acute care setting. J Intensive Care Med. 2010;25(5):286–300.
  • Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G; International Sepsis Definitions Conference. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. - PubMed - NCBI. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(4):530–8.
  • Chiu HC, Lin YC, Hsieh HM, Chen HP, Wang HL, Wang JY. The impact of complications on prolonged length of hospital stay after resection in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of Taiwanese patients. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(2):691–705.
  • Ahmed Ali U, Dunne T, Gurland B, Vogel JD, Kiran RP. Actual versus estimated length of stay after colorectal surgery: which factors influence a deviation? Am J Surg. 2014;208(4):663–9.
  • Murray AC, Chiuzan C,Kiran RP. Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12):5275–82.
  • Riché F, Gayat E, Barthélémy R, Le Dorze M, Matéo J, Payen D. Reversal of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio in early versus late death from septic shock. Critical Care. 2015; 19:439.
  • Edwards MR, Sultan P, del Arroyo AG, Whittle J, Karmali SN, Moonesinghe SR, et al. Metabolic dysfunction in lymphocytes promotes postoperative morbidity. Clin Sci (Lond). 129(5):423–37.
  • Cabrera-Perez J, Condotta SA, Badovinac VP, Griffith TS. Impact of sepsis on CD4 T cell immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96(5):767–77.
  • Bhardwaj N, Mathur P, Kumar S, Gupta A, Gupta D, John NV, et al. Depressed Monocytic Activity may be a Predictor for Sepsis. J Lab Physicians 2015;7(1):26-31.
  • Saeed L, Patnaik MM, Begna KH, Al-Kali A, Litzow MR, Hanson CA, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymphocytopenia, monocytopenia and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in primary myelodysplastic syndromes: a single center experience in 889 patients. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7(3):550.
  • Yang Z, Zhang Z, Lin F, Ren Y, Liu D, Zhong R, et al. Comparisons of neutrophil-, monocyte-, eosinophil-, and basophil- lymphocyte ratios among various systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. APMIS. 2017;125(10):863-71.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet