Analysis of climate denialism on YouTubeRefuting instead of debating

  1. DAVID VICENTE TORRICO
Revista:
Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies

ISSN: 1757-1898

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 15

Número: 2

Páginas: 217-235

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1386/CJCS_00089_1 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The scientific consensus on the existence, the human origin, the seriousness of the consequences and the urgency of adopting immediate solutions to climate change is growing, as successive reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have shown. The alteration of global climate patterns experienced in recent years confirms the worst prediction models, and yet there are still voices that question these facts. This study proposes to examine the interpretative frameworks underpinning public discussion of climate denialism on the online video platform YouTube. To this end, it presents an analysis of the 50 most popular videos under the label of climate denialism in Spanish, paying attention to the key issues and figures on which the denialist ideology is articulated and the attitude of support, neutrality or rejection on the part of those responsible for the content. The results obtained show the generalized rejection of the denialist discourse among Spanish-speaking content creators, who resort to experienced sources and contrasted resources to refute these arguments, as well as the politicization of scientific knowledge in terms of debate, uncertainty, mistrust and lack of commitment to deal with the consequences.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abellán López, M. Á. (2021), ‘El cambio climático: negacionismo, escepticismo y desinformación’, Tabula Rasa, 37, pp. 283–301, https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n37.13. [Google Scholar]
  • Alexa (2022), ‘Ranking de sitios más visitados’, https://www.alexa.com/topsites. Accessed 4 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • Allgaier, J. (2019), ‘Science and environmental communication on YouTube: Strategically distorted communications in online videos on climate change and climate engineering’, Frontiers in Communication, 4, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00036. [Google Scholar]
  • Almirón, N., Boykoff, M., Narberhaus, M. and Heras, F. (2020), ‘Dominant counter-frames in influential climate contrarian European think tanks’, Climatic Change, 162:4, pp. 2003–20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02820-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, A. (2009), ‘Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda’, Sociology Compass, 3:2, pp. 166–82, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D. and Corley, E. A. (2012), ‘The role of media and deference to scientific authority in cultivating trust in sources of information about emerging technologies’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24:2, pp. 225–37, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032. [Google Scholar]
  • Arévalo Salinas, A. I. (2014), ‘El movimiento social 15-M de España y la promoción de la protesta a través de sus vídeos en YouTube’, Historia y Comunicación Social, 19:0, pp. 153–63, https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.45122. [Google Scholar]
  • Bloomfield, E. F. and Tillery, D. (2019), ‘The circulation of climate change denial online: Rhetorical and networking strategies on Facebook’, Environmental Communication, 13:1, pp. 23–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1527378. [Google Scholar]
  • Boykoff, M. T. (2010), ‘Indian media representations of climate change in a threatened journalistic ecosystem’, Climatic Change, 99:1&2, pp. 17–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9807-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Carvalho, A. (2010), ‘Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1:2, pp. 172–79, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.13. [Google Scholar]
  • Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) (2022), Nota informativa de la ‘Encuesta sobre cuestiones de actualidad’, Madrid: CIS, https://www.cis.es/cis/opencms/EN/9_Prensa/Noticias/2022/prensa0561NI.html. Accessed 7 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper, C. B. (2011), ‘Media literacy as a key strategy toward improving public acceptance of climate change science’, BioScience, 61:3, pp. 231–37, https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.8. [Google Scholar]
  • Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S. and Monson, K. (2015), ‘How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6:5, pp. 523–34, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa Sánchez, C. (2014), ‘Audiovisual y Web 2.0: Empleo de YouTube por las empresas españolas con mejor reputación’, Chasqui: Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 126:126, pp. 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Diethelm, P. and McKee, M. (2009), ‘Denialism: What is it and how should scientist respond?’, European Journal of Public Health, 19:1, pp. 2–4, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn139. [Google Scholar]
  • Dolšak, N. and Houston, K. (2014), ‘Newspaper coverage and climate change legislative activity across US states’, Global Policy, 5:3, pp. 286–97, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn139. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunlap, R. E. (2013), ‘Climate change skepticism and denial: An introduction’, American Behavioral Scientist, 57:6, pp. 691–98, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213477097. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunlap, R. E. and McCright, A. (2011), ‘Organized climate change denial’, in J. Dryzed, R. Norgaard and D. Schlosberg (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ekberg, K., Forchtner, B., Hultman, M. and Jylhä, K. M. (2022), Climate Obstruction: How Denial, Delay and Inaction Are Heating the Planet, London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Entman, R. M. (1993), ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, pp. 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Erviti, M. C., Azevedo, J. and Codina, M. (2018), ‘When science becomes controversial’, in B. León and M. Bourk (eds), Communicating Science and Technology through Online Video, London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Fernández Reyes, R. (2010), ‘Reconocimiento y cuestionamiento mediático del cambio climático en España’, Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, 10, pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • González Puente, V. (2021), ‘La divulgación científica en YouTube: Estudio de caso de jóvenes estudiantes en España’, MA dissertation, Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunster, S. (2011), ‘Covering Copenhagen: Climate change in BC media’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 36:3, pp. 477–502, https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2011v36n3a2367. [Google Scholar]
  • Heras, F. (2013), ‘La negación del cambio climático en España: Percepciones sociales y nuevos tratamientos mediáticos’, in R. Mancinas and R. Fernández (eds), Medios de comunicación y cambio climático, Sevilla: Fénix. [Google Scholar]
  • Heras, F. (2018), ‘Respuetas ante el negacionismo climático de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global’, Revista PAPELES, 140, pp. 119–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Howell, E. L., Wirz, C. D., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D. and Xenos, M. A. (2020), ‘Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism’, Public Understanding of Science, 29:8, pp. 800–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520962741. [Google Scholar]
  • Igartua Perosanz, J. J. (2006), Métodos cuantitativos de investigación en comunicación, Barcelona: Editorial Bosch. [Google Scholar]
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001), Cambio climático 2001. Informe de síntesis, Wembley: IPCC, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/08/TAR_syrfull_es.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2022), AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2022, Wembley: IPCC, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/. Accessed 4 January 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Krippendorff, K. (1990), Metodología de análisis de contenido: Teoría y práctica, Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica. [Google Scholar]
  • Lampis, A. (2013), ‘La adaptación al cambio climático: El reto de las dobles agendas’, in J. C. Postigo (ed.), Cambio climático, movimientos sociales y políticas públicas: una vinculación necesaria, Santiago de Chile: Clacso. [Google Scholar]
  • León, B. and Bourk, M. (2018), Communicating Science and Technology through Online Video, London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • León, B. and Erviti, M.C. (2013), ‘Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news’, Public Understanding of Science, 24:2, pp. 183–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513500196. [Google Scholar]
  • Lovell, J. (2015), ‘YouTube’s rock stars of science make a splash a VidCon’, Scientific American, 30 July, https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/youtube-s-rock-stars-of-science-make-a-splash-a-vidcon1. Accessed 7 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Martín Sánchez, A. (2020), ‘Respuestas a la crisis climática: Negacionismo populista y nacionalismo verde’, Ecología Política, 59, pp. 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Martín Sosa, S. (2021), ‘Apuntes metodológicos para el estudio del negacionismo climático en los medios escritos’, Communication & Methods, 3:1, pp. 56–66, https://doi.org/10.35951/v3i1.111. [Google Scholar]
  • Michael, M. (2017), ‘Destroying iPhones: Feral science and the antithetical citizen’, Public Understanding of Science, 27:6, pp. 731–44, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517738149. [Google Scholar]
  • Mohan, L. (2021), ‘Perspective: Tackling misinformation on YouTube’, Inside YouTube, 25 August, https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/tackling-misinfo/. Accessed 7 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Neuendorf, K. (2002), The Content Analysis Guidebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Soukup, P. A. (2014), ‘Looking at, with, and through YouTube’, Communication Research Trends, 33, pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Vicente Mariño, M. and Vicente Torrico, D. (2014), ‘Presencia y funciones del discurso científico en la cobertura informativa y cinematográfica del cambio climático’, Prisma Social, 12, pp. 120–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Vicente Torrico, D. (2020), ‘La posverdad climática de Donald Trump en la prensa española’, in E. Jiménez, M. E. del Valle and A. Felipe (eds), Los nuevos retos en ciencias sociales, artes y humanidades, Madrid: Gedisa, pp. 465–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Vicente Torrico, D. and González Puente, V. (2022), ‘Audiencias de medios tras la Covid-19: El salto definitivo hacia el consumo digital’, in T. Hidalgo Marí, J. Herrero Gutiérrez and J. Segarra Saavedra (eds), Pensando la comunicación: Reflexiones y debates en un mundo hiperconectado, Madrid: Dykinson, pp. 485–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Vicente Torrico, D. and López Vidales, N. (2022), ‘Recursos hipermedia en la cobertura de la emergencia climática durante el año 2019 en España: Análisis de “El País”, “La Vanguardia” y “El Confidencial”’, Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 28:2, pp. 461–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Weart, S. (2011), ‘Global warming: How skepticism became denial’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67:1, pp. 41–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340210392966. [Google Scholar]
  • Zehr, S. C. (2015), ‘The sociology of global climate change’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6:2, pp. 129–50, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.328. [Google Scholar]
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet