Supporting the Quality of Learning Objects Through Their Ranking Visualization

  1. E. M. Morales Morgado 1
  2. D. A. Gómez Aguilar 1
  3. F. J. García Peñalvo 1
  4. R. Therón Sánchez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)

ISSN: 1863-0383,  1868-8799

Año de publicación: 2009

Volumen: 4

Páginas: 24

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3991/IJET.V4S1.863 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)

Resumen

The quality of Learning Objects (LOs) is currently being promoted by certain tools which consider specific criteria for their evaluation; however, there is no existing methodology that considers both the value assigned to the LO itself and the percentage related to the number of evaluators who have compared the quality of resources. As in the case of various products offered through the Internet backed by an assessment of users in a unified ranking, the purpose of this paper is to suggest a proposal for the automated assessments of experts who can clearly see the best or worst aspects in LO quality.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • P. Avgeriou, S. Retails and M. Skordalakis, “An architecture for open learning management systems”. En Y. Manolopoulos, S. Evripidou, A.C. Kakas (Eds.) Advances in Informatics. Proceedings of the 8th Panhellenis Conference on Informatics, PCI 2001 Revised Selected Papers. Lectures Notes in Computer Science. LNCS 2563. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2003. pp.183-200.
  • K. Braun, M. Gadney, H. Matthew, A. Roselli, D. Synstelien, T. Walter and D. Wertheimer, “Usabilidad”. Ediciones Anaya Multimedia Madrid, 2003.
  • S. Graf, B. List, “An evaluation of open source e-learning platforms stressing adaptation issues. Advanced Learning Technologies”, ICALT 2005. Fifth IEEE International Conference on 5-8 July 2005 Page(s):163 - 165.
  • IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata: ANSI/IEEE, 2002. http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/
  • Y. Ohta, H. Nakano, K. Suzuki, T. Kiyan, T. Shimizu, C. Noguchi, T. Kita, H. Akiyama, “Practical study of instructional environments for lifelong e-learning, Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training”, 2005. ITHET 2005. 6th nternational Conference on 7-9 July 2005 Page(s):T4B/6 - T4B11.
  • T. A. Powell, “Diseño de Sitios Web: Manual de referencia”. Madrid: McGraw-Hill, 2001
  • M. J. Rosenberg, “E-learning. Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age”. Bogotá: Mc Graw Hill, 2001.
  • E. M. Morales, F. J. García and Á. Barrón, “LOs Instructional Design based on an Ontological Model to Improve their Quality,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Computers in Education, SIIE'06. León, Spain, October 24th - 26th , 2006. Vol. 1. Pages 441-448. ISBN Obra completa 84-9773-303-7. ISBN Vol. 1 84-9773-301-0.
  • E. M. Morales, F. J. García and Á. Barrón, “Key Issues for Learning Objects Evaluation,” in 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. Funchal, Madeira, 12 al 16 de Junio, 2007. ICEIS’07.
  • E. M. Morales, F. J. García and Á. Barrón. 2008, “An Evaluation Instrument for Learning Object Quality and Management,” in 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. (Barcelona, España, 12 al 16 de Junio, 2008). ICEIS’08. INSTICC Press. ISBN obra completa 978-972-8865-91-7. http://www.iceis.org
  • E. M. Morales, F. J. García and Á. Barrón, “Análisis comparativo de instrumentos de evaluación de Objetos de Aprendizaje”. Actas del V Simposio Pluridisciplinar sobre Diseño y Evaluación de Contenidos Educativos Reutilizables. Salamanca, España, 20 al 21 de Octubre, 2008. SPDECE’08. En prensa.
  • F. Moreno and M. Bailly-Baillière, “Diseño instructivo de la formación on-line.” Aproximación metodológica a la elaboración de contenidos, Editorial Ariel Educación, 2002. [13]J. Nielsen, J. “Usabilidad Diseño de Sitios Web”. Prentice Hall PTR, 2000.