Entre Historia Y Ciencias PolíticasTucídides Y El Problema De La Agencia Humana En La Historiografía Clásica

  1. Prieto, Juan P. 1
  1. 1 Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile
Revue:
Historia 396

ISSN: 0719-0719

Année de publication: 2022

Titre de la publication: Vol. 13, Número especial 1, 2023

Volumen: 12

Número: 3

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Historia 396

Résumé

This paper aims to critically reassess the quality and applicability of both concepts and models devised by Realist and Neorealist schools when studying Thucydides’ historiographical work. Hence, the analysis will be focused on three main axes: the issue of human agency in his work, the historian’s understanding and use of this notion, and how contemporary historians and Political scientists have downgraded or ignored such an important dimension when studying this work and its time. By way of specific case-studies, it is argued that three causes are to be pointed out as conducive to the so-called “pseudo-historical interpretations” of Thucydides and his Histories through misused methods originated in Political sciences: an exacerbated ontological pursue, documental as well as thematic athenocentrism, and disregarded archeo-epigraphical collaboration.Keywords: History, Political Sciences, Neorrealism, Polis, Historical Agency.

Références bibliographiques

  • Tucídides. Historia de la guerra del Peloponeso. Traducción de Juan José Torres Esbarranch. Madrid, Gredos, 1990.
  • Allison, Graham. Destined for war: can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? Boston-New York, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.
  • Allison, Graham. “The Thucydides trap: are the U.S. and China headed for war?” https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/09/united-states-china-war-thucydides-trap/406756/
  • Aron, Raymond. Peace and war: a theory of International Relations. London-New York, Routledge, 1966.
  • Aron, Raymond. “What is a theory of International relations?”. Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 21, Nº2, pp. 185-206.
  • Ashley, Richard K. “The Poverty of Neorealism”. Keohane, Robert O. (ed). Neorealism and its critics. New York, Columbia University Press, 1986, pp. 255-300.
  • Bordieu, Pierre. Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique. Paris, Librairie Droz, 1972.
  • Brisson, Pierre-Luc. Le moment unipolaire : Rome et la Méditerranée hellénistique (188-146 av. n. ère). Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec, 2021.
  • Burton, Paul. Friendship and empire. Roman diplomacy and imperialism in the Middle Republic (353-146 BC). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Years’ crisis, 1919-1939. London, Macmillan, 1939.
  • Chalmers, David, Metametaphysics: new essays on the foundations of ontology. Oxford, Oxford University Press,2009.
  • Crane, Gregory. Thucydides and the ancient simplicity. The limits of political realism. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London, University of California Press, 1998.
  • Eckstein, Arthur M. Mediterranean anarchy, interstate war, and the rise of Rome. Berkeley- Los Angeles, University of California Press, 2007.
  • Earley, Benjamin. The thucydidean turn: (re)interpreting Thucydides’ political thought before, during and after the Great War. London-New York, Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
  • Eckstein, Arthur M. Rome enters the Greek East: from Anarchy to Hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230-170 BC. Malden-Oxford-Victoria, Blackwell Publishing, 2008.
  • Ferrario, Sarah Brown. Historical agency and the great man’ in Classical Greece. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  • Fröhlich, Pierre. “L'inventaire du monde des cités grecques. Une somme, une méthode et une conception de l'histoire”. Revue Historique, Vol. 312, Nº3, 2010, pp. 637-677.
  • Fulkerson, Laurel. “Emotional Appeals in the Mytilenean Debate”. Syllecta Classica, Vol. 19. 2008, pp. 115-154.
  • Gauthier, Philippe. “A propos de ‘Politeia’”. Revue des Études Grecques, Vol. 97, fascicule 462-464, 1984, pp. 523-530.
  • Gomme, Arnold W. A historical commentary on Thucydides. Books II-III. Vol. 2. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1956.
  • González, Mathieu. “L'influence de Thucydide dans les théories des relations internationales après 1945”. Conférence prononcé le 7 février 2018 dans le séminaire Antheia de l'École doctorale 1 de la Faculté de Lettres de Sorbonne Université.), 2018 https://www.academia.edu/36369671/Linfluence_de_Thucydide_dans_les_théories_des_relations_internationales_après_1945.
  • González, Mathieu. “De la stasis y de las normas divinas en Tucídides”. Valdivia, José Antonio y Espisona, Ruth (eds.). Ética, creencia y conciencia. Ediciones Trea, Gijón, 2021, pp. 93-106.
  • Harris, William. Roman power. A thousand years of empire. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  • Hedrick, Charles W. “Democracy and the athenian epigraphical habit”. Hesperia, Vol. 68, Nº3, 1999, pp. 387-439.
  • Hirsch, Eli. Quantifier variance and realism: essays in metaontology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • Hölkeskamp, Karl-J. “The emergence of empire” (Reseña). The Classical Review. New Series, Vol. 59, Nº1, 2009, pp. 211-214.
  • IG I = Kirchner, Iohannes (ed.). Inscriptiones atticae Euclidis anno posteriores.... Pars I, Decreta continens. 1, Decreta annorum 403/2-230/29. Berlin, de Gruyter, 1913.
  • IG I2 = von Gaertringen, Friedrich Hiller. Inscriptiones Graecae I: Inscriptiones Atticae Euclidis anno (403/2) anteriores, 2nd edn. Berlin, de Gruyter, 1924.
  • IG I3 = David, Lewis y Lilian, Jeffery (eds.). Inscriptiones Graecae I: Inscriptiones Atticae Euclidis anno anteriores. 3rd edn., fasc. 3. Dedicationes. Catalogi. Termini. Tituli sepulcrales. Varia. Tituli Attici extra Atticam reperti. Addenda (nos. 501-1517). Berlin, de Gruyter, 1994.
  • Kagan, Donald. The outbreak of the Peloponnesian War. New York-London, Cornell University Press, 1969.
  • Kauppi, Mark V. “Thucydides: character and capabilities”. Frankel, Benjamin (ed.). Roots of imperialism. London-New York, Routledge, 1996, pp. 142-168.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Neorealism and its critics. New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.
  • Kirshner, Jonathan. “Offensive realism, Thucydides traps, and the tragedy of unforced errors: classical realism and US-China relations”. China International Strategy Review, Vol. 1, 2019, pp. 51-63.
  • Lang, Mabel. “Cleon as the anti-Pericles”. Classical Philology, Vol. 67, 1972, pp. 159-169.
  • Laurent, François. Histoire du droit des gens et des relations internationales. Gand, Hebbelynck-Merry, 1850.
  • Lebow, Richard N. “Thucydides the constructivist”. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 95, Nº3, 2001, pp. 547-560.
  • Legras, Bernard. “Une société nouvelle: les familles grecques d’Éléphantine (fin IVe-début IIIe siècle av. J.-C.)”. Parmentier, Édith y Coltelloni-Trannoy, Michèle (eds.). Famille et société dans le monde grec, en Italie et à Rome du Ve au IIe siècle avant J.-C. Toulouse, Presses Universitaires du Midi, 2017, pp. 153-167.
  • Lendon, Jon E. Empire of honour: the art of government in the Roman World. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • Liddle, Peter. “The places of publication of athenian state decrees from the 5th Century BC to the 3rd Century AD”. Zeitschrift für Papyrolofie und Epigraphik, Vol. 143, 2003. pp. 79-93.
  • Lieberman, Gauthier. Les préliminaires de la guerre. Prolégomènes à la lecture du premier livre de Thucydide. Bordeaux, Ausonius éditions, 2017.
  • Low, Polly. “Looking for the language of Athenian Imperialism”. Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 125, 2005, pp. 93-111.
  • Low, Polly. Interstate relations in Classical Greece. Cambridge-New York-Melbourne, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Mack, William. Proxeny and polis. Institutional networks in the Ancient Greek world. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015.
  • Mitchell, Lynette G. Greeks bearing gifts: the public use of private relationships in the Greek world, 435-323 BC. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • Hansen, Mogens Herman y Nielsen, Thomas Heine. An inventory of archaic and classical poleis. Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Hansen, Mogens Herman. Polis. An introduction to the Ancient Greek city-state. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • Hansen, Mogens Herman. Sources for the Ancient Greek city-state. Copenhagen, The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1995.
  • Moreno Leoni, Álvaro, “La invención de la ‘humanidad’ en la historiografía europea del siglo XX: sobre el tratamiento de los prisioneros de guerra en el mundo helenístico”. Revista de Historiografía, Vol. 34, 2020, pp. 253-275.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics among nations. New York, Knopf, 1948.
  • Morrison, James V. “A key topos in Thucydides: the comparison of cities and individuals”. The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 115, Nº4,1994, pp. 525-541.
  • Offerlé, Michel y Rousso, Henry. La fabrique interdisciplinaire: histoire et science politique. Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2008.
  • Offerlé, Michel. “Histoire et science politique”. Delacroix, Christian; Dosse, François; García, Patrick y Offenstadt, Nicolas. Historiographies. Concepts et débats I. Paris, Gallimard, 2010, pp. 357-365.
  • Osborne, Robin y Rhodes, Peter John. Greek historical inscriptions 478-404 BC. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
  • Sartre, Maurice. “Mediterranean Anarchy”. TOPOI, Vol. 15, Nº2, 2007, pp. 619-625.
  • Sallée, Frédéric. La mécanique de l’histoire. Paris, Le Cavalier Bleu, 2019.
  • Stapleton, Julia. “The classicist as liberal intellectual: Gilbert Murray and Alfred Eckhard Zimmern”. Stray, Christopher (ed.). Gilbert Murray reassessed: hellenism, theatre, and international politics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 261-291.
  • Tröster, Manuel. “Mediterranean Anarchy…” (Reseña). Gnomon, Vol. 81, Nº1, pp. 42-45.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. Man, state and war. New York, Columbia University Press, 1959.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.
  • Welch, David. “Why international relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides”. Review of International Studies, Vol. 29, Nº3, 2003, pp. 301-319.
La source de données: Dialnet