Papel de la tomografía computarizada en los procedimientos de cardiología intervencionista coronaria y estructural

  1. Manuel Barreiro Pérez 1
  2. Chi-Hion Li 2
  3. José Antonio Parada Barcia 1
  4. Álvaro Rodríguez Pérez 2
  5. María Fernanda Blanchet León 1
  6. Berenice Caneiro Queija 1
  7. Sergio López Tejero 3
  8. Pablo Antúnez Muiños 3
  9. Rodrigo Estévez Loureiro 1
  10. Ignacio Cruz González 3
  1. 1 Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur
  2. 2 Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
  3. 3 Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
REC: Interventional Cardiology

ISSN: 2604-7276,  2604-7306

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 6

Número: 3

Páginas: 201-212

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000460 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: REC: Interventional Cardiology

Resumen

La tomografía computarizada es una técnica no invasiva, de gran resolución espacial, con excelente definición del calcio y del espacio intravascular al emplear medios de contraste, que brinda la posibilidad de realizar tanto mediciones como simulaciones virtuales de intervencionismo coronario y estructural. Se ha establecido como la técnica de referencia en la selección de pacientes y la planificación de procedimientos de intervencionismo transcatéter coronario y estructural en diferentes escenarios (implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica, cierre percutáneo de orejuela izquierda, reemplazo de válvula mitral transcatéter y reemplazo de válvula tricúspide transcatéter). El presente trabajo revisa el papel de la tomografía computarizada en el intervencionismo cardiaco coronario y estructural.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, et al. SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography:A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee:Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:435-449.
  • Knuuti J, Ballo H, Juarez-Orozco LE, et al. The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina:a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3322-3330.
  • Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1291-1300.
  • Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407-477.
  • Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3720-3826.
  • Delgado V, Ajmone Marsan N, De Waha S, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3948-4042.
  • McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3599-3726.
  • Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561-632.
  • Arbelo E, Protonotarios A, Gimeno JR, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503-3626.
  • Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3826-3924.
  • Pelliccia A, Sharma S, Gati S, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17-96.
  • Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, et al. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease:The PERFECTION Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497.
  • Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, et al. Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:924-933.
  • Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M, Kofoed KF, et al. CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1591-1602.
  • Jones DA, Beirne AM, Kelham M, et al. Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography Before Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Previous Bypass Surgery:The BYPASS-CTCA Trial. Circulation. 2023;148:1371-1380.
  • Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography:A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:342-358.
  • Andreini D, Collet C, Leipsic J, et al. Pre-procedural planning of coronary revascularization by cardiac computed tomography:An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16:558-572.
  • Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. CAD-RADSTM Coronary Artery Disease –Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:269-281.
  • Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, et al. CAD-RADSTM 2.0 –2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System:An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16:536-557.
  • Papadopoulou SL, Girasis C, Dharampal A, et al. CT-SYNTAX score:a feasibility and reproducibility study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:413-415.
  • Collet C, Miyazaki Y, Ryan N, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Multivessel CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2756-2769.
  • Gabara L, Hinton J, Kira M, et al. Derivation and validation of a novel functional FFRCT score incorporating the burden of coronary stenosis severity and flow impairment to predict clinical events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024;18:33-42.
  • Kageyama S, Serruys PW, Kotoku N, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography-based SYNTAX score for comprehensive assessment of advanced coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024;18:120-136.
  • Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes:the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:213-221.
  • Opolski MP, Achenbach S, Schuhbäck A, et al. Coronary computed tomographic prediction rule for time-efficient guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion:insights from the CT-RECTOR multicenter registry (Computed Tomography Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:257-267.
  • Yu CW, Lee HJ, Suh J, et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Guidewire Crossing and Success of Percutaneous Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion:Korean Multicenter CTO CT Registry Score as a Tool for Assessing Difficulty in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:e005800.
  • Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, et al. 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Management of Adults With Aortic Stenosis:A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1313-1346.
  • Blanke P, Weir-McCall JR, Achenbach S, et al. Computed Tomography Imaging in the Context of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)/Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR):An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1-24.
  • Francone M, Budde RPJ, Bremerich J, et al. CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation:standardisation of scanning protocols, measurements and reporting —a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur Radiol. 2020;30:2627-2650.
  • Hahn RT, Kodali S, Tuzcu EM, et al. Echocardiographic imaging of procedural complications during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:288-318.
  • Ribeiro HB, Webb JG, Makkar RR, et al. Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation:insights from a large multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1552-1562.
  • Kim WK, Toggweiler S, Renker M, et al. Comparison of 3-Cusp Coplanar and 2-Cusp Overlap Views for the Implantation of a Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:1422-1424.
  • Toggweiler S, Gurvitch R, Leipsic J, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement:vascular outcomes with a fully percutaneous procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:113-118.
  • Jilaihawi H, Chen M, Webb J, et al. A Bicuspid Aortic Valve Imaging Classification for the TAVR Era. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1145-1158.
  • Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Evangelista A, et al. International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60:448-476.
  • Petronio AS, Angelillis M, De Backer O, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation:Development and validation of an algorithm based on multi-slice computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14:452-461.
  • Iannopollo G, Romano V, Buzzatti N, et al. Supra-annular sizing of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses in raphe-type bicuspid aortic valve disease:the LIRA method. Int J Cardiol. 2020;317:144-151.
  • Weir-McCall JR, Attinger-Toller A, Blanke P, et al. Annular versus supra-annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14:407-413.
  • Tang GHL, Komatsu I, Tzemach L, et al. Risk of coronary obstruction and the need to perform BASILICA:the VIVID classification. EuroIntervention. 2020;16:E757-E759.
  • Tarantini G, Sathananthan J, Fabris T, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:1777-1793.
  • Jilaihawi H, Asch FM, Manasse E, et al. Systematic CT Methodology for the Evaluation of Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:461-470.
  • Eng MH, Wang DD, Greenbaum AB, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of 3-dimensional computed tomography guidance versus TEE data for left atrial appendage occlusion (PRO3DLAAO). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:401-407.
  • Korsholm K, Berti S, Iriart X, et al. Expert Recommendations on Cardiac Computed Tomography for Planning Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:277-292.
  • Cepas-Guillén P, Flores-Umanzor E, Leduc N, et al. Impact of Device Implant Depth After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:2139-2149.
  • Halkin A, Cohen C, Rosso R, et al. Left atrial appendage and pulmonary artery anatomic relationship by cardiac-gated computed tomography:Implications for late pulmonary artery perforation by left atrial appendage closure devices. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:2064-2069.
  • De Backer O, Iriart X, Kefer J, et al. Impact of Computational Modeling on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure Efficiency and Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:655-666.
  • Agudelo V, Millán X, Li CH, et al. Prevalence, mechanisms and impact of residual patency and device-related thrombosis following left atrial appendage occlusion:a computed tomography analysis. EuroIntervention. 2021;17:E944-E952.
  • Saw J, Fahmy P, DeJong P, et al. Cardiac CT angiography for device surveillance after endovascular left atrial appendage closure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1198-1206.
  • Pulerwitz TC, Khalique OK, Leb J, et al. Optimizing Cardiac CT Protocols for Comprehensive Acquisition Prior to Percutaneous MV and TV Repair/Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:836-850.
  • Babaliaros VC, Lederman RJ, Gleason PT, et al. The Art of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Valve-in-Ring and Valve-in-Mitral-Annular-Calcification Procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:2195-2214.
  • Guerrero M, Wang DD, Pursnani A, et al. A Cardiac Computed Tomography-Based Score to Categorize Mitral Annular Calcification Severity and Predict Valve Embolization. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:1945-1957.
  • Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, Latib A, et al. Predictors of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:182-193.
  • Barreiro-Perez M, Caneiro-Queija B, Puga L, et al. Imaging in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement:State-of-Art Review. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5973.
  • Hell MM, Emrich T, Kreidel F, et al. Computed tomography imaging needs for novel transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and replacement therapies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;22:601-610.
  • Lopes BBC, Hashimoto G, Bapat VN, Sorajja P, Scherer MD, Cavalcante JL. Cardiac Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Tricuspid Valve:Preprocedural Planning and Postprocedural Follow-up. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2022;11:27-40.
  • 56. Barreiro-Pérez M, González-Ferreiro R, Caneiro-Queija B, et al. Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement:Illustrative Case Reports and Review of State-of-Art. J Clin Med. 2023;12:1371.
  • Koo HJ, Lee JY, Kim GH, et al. Paravalvular leakage in patients with prosthetic heart valves:cardiac computed tomography findings and clinical features. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:1419-1427.
  • Entrikin DW, Gupta P, Kon ND, Carr JJ. Imaging of infective endocarditis with cardiac CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6:399-405.
  • Lesser JR, Han BK, Newell M, Schwartz RS, Pedersen W, Sorajja P. Use of cardiac CT angiography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak:a practical guide. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:159-164.
  • Morris MF, Pena A, Kalya A, et al. Predicting paravalvular leak after transcatheter mitral valve replacement using commercially available software modeling. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14:495-499.
  • Siripornpitak S, Goo HW. CT and MRI for Repaired Complex Adult Congenital Heart Diseases. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22:308-323.
  • Arzamendi D, Li CH, Serra A. Cardiac Computed Tomography-guided Closure of Ventricular Septal Defect Secondary to Myocardial Infarction. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68:626.
  • Hussain MA, Nabi F. Complex Structural Interventions:The Role of Computed Tomography, Fluoroscopy, and Fusion Imaging. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017;13:98-105.
  • Barreiro-Perez M, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Moreno-Samos JC, Barahona MF, Sanchez PL. Cardiovascular Structural Interventions —Echo/Computed Tomography-Fluoroscopy Fusion Imaging Atlas. Circ J. 2018;82:2206-2207.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet