Lenguas naturales, sistemas cognitivos humanos, y los límites del cerebro lingüístico

  1. Ivanova, Olga 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics

ISSN: 1893-3211

Ano de publicación: 2024

Título do exemplar: Topic of the monographic section: argument structure; xxxvii-xl

Volume: 13

Número: 1

Páxinas: 37-40

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.7557/1.13.1.7604 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics

Resumo

Respuesta final de Ivanova a Horno y conclusión del debate.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baker, M. C. (2015). Nouns, verbs, and verbal nouns: Their structure and their structural cases. In J. Blaszczak , D. Klimek-Jankowska and K. Migdalski (eds.), How Categorical are Categories. New Approaches to the Old Questions of Noun, Verb, and Adjective (pp. 13-46). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514510-003
  • Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., & Sudhalter, V. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(1), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1005
  • Cangelosi, A., & Parisi, D. (2001). How nouns and verbs differentially affect the behavior of artificial organisms. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 170-175). Lawrence Erlbaum London.
  • Dietrich, E., & Markman, A. B. (2003). Discrete thoughts: Why cognition must use discrete representations. Mind & Language, 18(1), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00216
  • García, C. L. (2014). Funciones y homología funcional en las ciencias cognitivas. Crítica, 46(137), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2014.572
  • Haspelmath, M. (2012). How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. In T. Graf et al. (eds.), Theories of Everything: In Honor of Edward Keenan (pp. 109-130). Los Angeles: UCLA.
  • Haspelmath, M. (2023). Against (lexical-)categorial typology: Why school grammars are basically right. Diversity Linguistics Comment. Retrieved May 18, 2024, from https://dlc.hypotheses.org/3467 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198852889.013.2
  • Haspelmath, M. (2023). Word-class universals and language-particular analysis. In E. van Lier (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Word Classes (pp. 15-40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liang, J., & Liu, H. (2013). Noun distribution in natural languages. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 49(4), 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2013-0019
  • Mintz, T. H. (2002). Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language. Memory & Cognition, 30(5), 678-686. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196424
  • Nikolaeva, I. (2008). Between nouns and adjectives: A constructional view. Lingua, 118(7), 969-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.07.003
  • Rijkhoff, J. (2007). Word classes. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00030.x
  • Smolensky, P. (2012). Cognition: Discrete or continuous computation. In S.B. Cooper & J. van Leeuwen (eds.), Alan Turing—His Work and Impact (pp. 532-539). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 387-422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060177
  • Tily, H., Frank, M., & Jaeger, F. (2011). The learnability of constructed languages reflects typological patterns. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 33(33), 1364-1369.