Orthographic effects in word recognition among Spanish-speaking learners of English

  1. María Teresa Martínez García 1
  1. 1 University of Utah
    info

    University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/03r0ha626

Aldizkaria:
Langue(s) & Parole: revista de filología francesa y románica

ISSN: 2466-7757

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakia: 8

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5565/REV/LANGUESPAROLE.131 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Langue(s) & Parole: revista de filología francesa y románica

Laburpena

Bien que la perception de la parole influence la reconnaissance des mots, on ne comprend pas bien quels aspects spécifiques de la cartographie L1-L2 jouent le rôle le plus important. Cette étude explore si les informations d’orthographe visuelle influencent la cartographie des informations phonémiques dans une L2 et, le cas échéant, quelle en est incidence à la fois sur la perception et sur la reconnaissance des mots. Un groupe d’apprenants hispanophones d’anglais ont effectué une tâche AXB et une tâche de monitorage de mots anglais dans lesquels la place des phonèmes labiodental /v/ et bilabial /b/, qui sont allophoniques en espagnol mais phonémiques en anglais (par exemple, best vs. vest), avait été modifiée. Les résultats montrent un effet clair de la L1 des apprenants sur la perception et la reconnaissance des mots de la L2, modulé en partie par les informations orthographiques vues. Ces résultats soutiennent les modèles qui prédisent la cartographie des phonèmes L1-L2, en soulignant à quel point les informations orthographiques peuvent être une variable importante à prendre en compte.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • ABRAMSON, A. S., LISKER, L., Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests, in HÁLA, B., ROMPORTL, M., JANOTA, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague, Academia, 1970, 569-573.
  • BAAYEN, H. R., Analyzing Linguistic Data: a Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511801686
  • BASSETTI, B., Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: LEARNING, MEMORY, AND COGNITION, 2017, 43(11), 1835-1842. https://doi.org/10.1037/ xlm0000417
  • BASSETTI, B., HAYES-HARB, R., ESCUDERO, P., Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input, APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2015, 36(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0142716414000393
  • BASSETTI, B., MAIRANO, P., MASTERSON, J., CERNI, T., Effects of orthographic forms on L2 speech production and phonological awareness, with consideration of speaker level predictors, LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2020, 70(4), 1218-1256. https:// doi.org/10.1111/lang.12423.
  • BASSETTI, B., SOKOLOVIC-PEROVIC, M., MAIRANO, P., CERNI, T., Orthography-induced length contrasts in the second language phonological systems of L2 speakers of English: Evidence from minimal pairs, LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2018, 61, 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918780141
  • BEST, C. T., A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception, in STRANGE, W. (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research, Timonium, MD, York Press, 1995, 171-204.
  • BEST, C. T., MCROBERTS, G. W., Infant perception of non-native consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways, LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2003, 46(2–3), 183-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020701
  • BROERSMA, M., CUTLER, A., Competition dynamics of second-language listening, QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64(1), 74-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.499174
  • CARTAGENA, N., Apuntes para la Historia del Español en Chile, Santiago, Academia Chilena de la Lengua, 2002.
  • ERDENER, V.D., BURNHAM, D.K., The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production, LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2005, 55(2), 191-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00303.x
  • ESCUDERO, P., HAYES-HARB, R., MITTERER, H., Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access, JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2008, 36(2), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.11.002
  • ESCUDERO, P., WANROOIJ, K., The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception, LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2010, 53(3), 343-365. https://doi.org /10.1177/0023830910371447
  • FLEGE, J.E., Second language speech learning: theory, findings, and problems, Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, Timonium, York Press MD, 1995, 233-277. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1995.tb01710.x
  • FLEGE, J.E., BOHN, O.S., JANG, S., Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels, JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1997, 25(4), 437-470, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
  • FLEGE, J.E., SCHILLER, N.O, MEYER, A.S., Assessing Constraints on Second-language Segmental Production and Perception. Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities, Berlin, de Gruyter Mouton, 2003, 319-355. https://doi.org /10.1515/9783110895094.319
  • GOTO, H., Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “l” and “r”, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1971, 9, 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90027-3
  • HAYES-HARB, R., NICOL, J., BARKER, J., Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input, LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2010, 53(3), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910371460
  • HOTHORN, T., EVERITT, B. S., A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R, New York, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420010657
  • HUALDE, J., Los sonidos del español: Spanish Language Edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511719943
  • JONGMAN, A., WAYLAND, R., WONG, S., Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives, THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 108(3), 1252-1263. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1288413
  • KILBORN, K., MOSS, H., Word Monitoring, LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1996, 11(6), 689-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387105
  • LISKER, L., ABRAMSON, A.S., The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics, Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR11, 1967, 9-15.
  • MARTÍNEZ-GARCÍA, M.T., Syllable Structure Effects in Word Recognition by Spanish-and German-Speaking Second Language Learners of English, ATLANTIS. JOURNAL OF THE SPANISH ASSOCIATION FOR ANGLO-AMERICAN STUDIES, 2021, 43(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2021-43.2.01
  • MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition, COGNITION, 1987, 25(1-2), 71-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9.
  • MATHIEU, L., The influence of foreign scripts on the acquisition of a second language phonological contrast, SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2016, 32(2), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315601882
  • MCCLELLAND, J. L., ELMAN, J. L., The TRACE model of speech perception, COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18(1), 1–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
  • NORRIS, D., Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition, COGNITION, 1994, 52(3), 189–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
  • PALLIER, C., COLOMÉ, A., SEBASTIÁN-GALLÉS, N., The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-Based versus abstract lexical entries, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12(6), 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00383
  • POLKA, L., Characterizing the influence of native experience on adult speech perception, PERCEPTION AND PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1992, 52, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.3758 /bf03206758
  • POLKA, L., WERKER, J. F., Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20, 421-435. https://doi.org /10.1037 //0096-1523.20.2.421
  • R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM., R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, 2009, 201. http:// www.R-project.org
  • RAFAT, Y., STEVENSON, R. A., Auditory-orthographic integration at the onset of L2 speech acquisition, LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2019, 62(3), 427-451. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0023830918777537
  • SIMON, E., CHAMBLESS, D., ALVES, U.K., Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast, LANGUAGE SCIENCES, 2010, 32(3), 380-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2009.07.001
  • STRANGE, W., AKAHANE-YAMADA, R., KUBO, R., TRENT, S.A., NISHI, K., Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners, JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109, 1691-1704. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1353594
  • STEVENS, J., On the Labiodental Pronunciation of Spanish /b/ among Teachers of Spanish as a Second Language, HISPANIA, 2000, 83(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.2307/346152
  • TAGLIAFERRI, B., Paradigm, Perception Research Systems, Inc., 2005. www.perceptionresearchsystems.com
  • TAKAWAKI, S. L., Orthographic loyalty in the Spanish of northern Mexican speakers, Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), 2012. Retrieved from: https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/97661/content//tmp/package5PYacT/Takawaki_asu_0010N_12317.pdf
  • TIM, L., Three consonants in Chicano Spanish: /x/, /b/ and /d/, BILINGUAL REVIEW / LA REVISTA BILINGÜE, 1976, 3(2), 153-162. Retrieved from: http:// www.jstor.org.lib.utep.edu/stable/25743678
  • TORRES CACOULLOS, R., FERREIRA, F., Lexical frequency and voiced labiodental-bilabial variation in new Mexican Spanish, SOUTHWEST JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS, 2000, 19(2), 1-17. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com /docview/85527614?accountid=7121
  • TROVATO, A., A Sociophonetic Analysis of Contact Spanish in the United States: Labiodentalization and Labial Consonant Variation, UT Electronic Thesis and Dissertations, 2017. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/63721/TROVATODISSERTATION-2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • VELEVA, M., The perception of the voiced/voiceless phonological opposition in Bulgarian by Arab learners, SUPOSTAVITELNO EZIKOZNANIE/CONTRASTIVE LINGUISTICS, 1985, 10, 28-37.
  • WEBER, A., CUTLER, A., Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition, JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 50(1), 1–25. https://doi.org /10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00105-0
  • WERKER, J.F., LALONDE, C.E., Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change, DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 24, 672-683. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.672
  • WERKER, J.F., LOGAN, J.S., Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception, PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1985, 37, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.3758 /bf03207136
  • WERKER, J.F., TEES, R.C., Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life, INFANT BEHAVIOR AND DEVELOPMENT, 1984, 7, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0163-6383(02)00093-0
  • YAZAWA, K., WHANG, J., KONDO, M., ESCUDERO, P., Language-dependent cue weighting: An investigation of perception modes in L2 learning, SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2020, 36(4), 557-581. https://doi.org/10.1177 /0267658319832645
Datuen iturria: Dialnet