Norma Carmen
Gutiérrez Gutiérrez
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, EspañaPublicaciones en colaboración con investigadores/as de Hospital Universitario La Paz (11)
2024
2022
-
Unsupervised machine learning improves risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an analysis of the Spanish Myeloma Group
Blood cancer journal, Vol. 12, Núm. 4, pp. 76
2020
-
Biological and clinical significance of dysplastic hematopoiesis in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
Blood, Vol. 135, Núm. 26, pp. 2375-2387
2017
-
Depth of response in multiple myeloma: A pooled analysis of three PETHEMA/GEM clinical trials
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 35, Núm. 25, pp. 2900-2910
2013
2012
-
Clinical significance of CD81 expression by clonal plasma cells in high-risk smoldering and symptomatic multiple myeloma patients
Leukemia, Vol. 26, Núm. 8, pp. 1862-1869
-
High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma
Blood, Vol. 119, Núm. 3, pp. 687-691
-
Maintenance therapy with bortezomib plus thalidomide or bortezomib plus prednisone in elderly multiple myeloma patients included in the GEM2005MAS65 trial
Blood, Vol. 120, Núm. 13, pp. 2581-2588
-
Multiparameter flow cytometry evaluation of plasma cell DNA content and proliferation in 595 transplant-eligible patients with myeloma included in the Spanish GEM2000 and GEM2005<65y trials
American Journal of Pathology, Vol. 181, Núm. 5, pp. 1870-1878
-
Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretransplantation therapy in multiple myeloma: A randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study
Blood, Vol. 120, Núm. 8, pp. 1589-1596
2010
-
Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: A randomised trial
The Lancet Oncology, Vol. 11, Núm. 10, pp. 934-941