Supreme leaders of the nationHistory characteristics of presidential supremacy in latin america and the united states

  1. Agustín E. Ferraro 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Historia Actual Online

ISSN: 1696-2060

Año de publicación: 2015

Título del ejemplar:

Número: 37

Páginas: 135-145

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Historia Actual Online

Resumen

The present paper studies the history and characteristics of the legal concept of su-premacy. The concept of supremacy is employed by several constitutions in Latin America to define the powers of the president, and to establish the role of the president as leader of the Nation. Although a concept of supremacy has been used in recent controversies about the presidency of the United States, the paper shows that constitutional powers of presidents in Latin America are very different from the powers assigned to the president by the United States constitution. The differences are described in the paper. First of all, the paper analyses constitutional language, the opinions of legal scholars and judicial precedents. Secondly, the history of the concept of presidential supremacy is considered. Finally, the paper discusses the impact of presidential supremacy on the state structure and on the consolidation of national institutions

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alberdi, Juan Bautista. 1852. Bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la República Argentina. Buenos Aires: Imprenta Argentina. Accesed August 9, 2014: http://books.google.es/booksid=N6dcAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&vq=%22autoridad+superior%22&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=o nepage&q&f=false
  • Benton, Allyson. 2002: “Diagnóstico Institucional del Sistema de Servicio Civil de México”. Paper presented at the “III Meeting of the Management and Transparency Network”, Washington, D.C.: BID. Disponible en: [última consulta 20 de junio de 2006] http://www.iadb.org/int/DRP/esp/Red5/Docu mentos/BIDMexico11-02esp.pdf
  • Bodin, Jean. 1576. Les Six Livres de la République. Paris: Jacques du Puys.
  • Budge, Ian, David McKay, Kenneth Newton, and John Bartle. 2013. The New British Politics (4th edition). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
  • Cortes de Cadiz. 1812. Diario de las discusiones y actas de las Cortes. Tomo XIII. Cadiz: Imprenta Real. Accesed August 29, 2014: http://books.google.es/books?id=1RZDAAAAcA AJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
  • Di Tella, Torcuato and Néstor Kirchner. 2003. Conversaciones después del derrumbe. Teoría y práctica política en la Argentina que viene. Buenos Aires: Galerna.
  • Gordillo, Agustín. 2010. Tratado de derecho administrativo y obras selectas. Tomo 4: el procedimiento administrativo. 10º edición. Buenos Aires: F.D.A.
  • Gorla, Carlos María. 1984. Los establecimientos españoles en la Patagonia: estudio institucional. Sevilla: CSIC.
  • Ferraro, Agustín. 2006. “Una idea muy precaria: El nuevo servicio civil y los viejos designados políticos en Argentina”, Latin American Research Review 41 (2): 165-182.
  • Gomes, Eugenio Maria and Almir Morgado. 2012. Compendio de administraçao. Administraçao publica e privada de A a Z, Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
  • Grudin, Michaela Paasche and Robert Grudin. 2012. Boccaccio's Decameron and the Ciceronian Renaissance. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Marconi, Nelson. 2002. “Diagnóstico do Sistema de Serviço Civil do Governo Federal no Brasil”. Paper presented at the “III Meeting of the Management and Transparency Network”, Washington, D.C.: BID. Accesed June 20, 2014: http://www2.enap.gov.br/mesa_redonda/dow nloads/Marconi_CLAD_03_clad0047409.pdf
  • MINHAP – Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas. 2013. “Boletín estadístico del personal al servicio de las administraciones públicas.” Julio 2013. Accesed August 23, 2014: http://www.seap.minhap.gob.es/dms/es/public aciones/centro_de_publicaciones_de_la_sgt/Periododicas/parrafo/Boletin_Estadis_Personal/BE_JUL2 013.pdf
  • Morgenstern, Scott, John Polga-Hecimovich, and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield2013. “Tall, Grande, or Venti: Presidential Powers in the United States and Latin America” Journal of Politics in Latin America 5 (2): 37-70.
  • Pacheco, Regina. 2004. “Public Management as a Non-Policy Field in Lula´S Administration”. Paper presented at the conference on Generation Reform in Brazil and Other Nations, Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas. Accesed June 20, 2014 http://www.ebape.fgv.br/novidades/pdf/Pache co.pdf
  • Philip, George. 2003. Democracy in Latin America: surviving conflict and crisis?, Cambridge: Polity press.
  • Rosenbloom, David. 2001. “Whose Bureaucracy Is This, Anyway? Congress’ 1946 Answer.” Political Science & Politics 34: 773-777.
  • Rosenbloom, David. 2000. Building a legislativecentered public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
  • RTA 1439 – Deutsche Reichtagsakten unter König Albrecht II. Zweite Abteilung: 1439. Hg. von Helmut Waigel. Stuttgart: Friedrich Andreas Perthes A.G., 1935. Accessed August 21, 2014, http://147.231.53.91/src/index.php?s=v&cat=2 7&bookid=347&page=0
  • U.S. 1935. Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602, 627.
  • Wayne, John Hankey. 1992. “Dionysius dixit, Lex divinitatis est ultima per media reducere: Aquinas, Hierocracy and the 'augustinisme politique.'” In Tommaso D’Aquino: proposte nuove di letture. Festscrift Antonio Tognolo, ed. Ilario Tolomio, 119-150. Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale 18, Padova: Editrice Antenore.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet