La docencia universitaria en la formación inicial del profesoradoel caso de la escuela de magisterio de Segovia

  1. Arribas Estebaranz, José María
  2. Carabias Galindo, David
  3. Monreal Guerrero, Inés María
Aldizkaria:
Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

ISSN: 1575-0965

Argitalpen urtea: 2010

Zenbakien izenburua: Escenarios Educativos. Aportaciones desde la investigación // Educational Scenarios. Contributions from research (Zaragoza, October 1st, 2010)

Alea: 13

Zenbakia: 3

Orrialdeak: 27-35

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

Laburpena

This article shows the results of research conducted in the School of Education of Segovia, during the 2008-2009 school years about three fundamental aspects in the teaching-learning process: the methodology, the evaluation system and skills and competency development and professional teachers. This investigation is based primarily on analysis of the answers given by three groups of informants: teachers, students, seniors and graduate career. The instrument used is a validated questionnaire for each of these three aspects to our study.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • BLACK, P. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5.7-75.
  • BOUD, D. FLACHIKOV, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. Learning for the long term. Oxon: Routledge
  • FLACHIKOV, N. (2005). Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement. Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. Oxon: Routledge.
  • GAUTHIER, C. (2006). La política sobre formación inicial de docentes en Québec. Revista de Educación, 340,165-185.
  • HOOGVELD, A. Training higher education teachers for instructional design of competency- based education: product-oriented versus process-oriented worked examples. Teaching and teacher education: An international journal of research and studies, Vol. 21, nº 3, 287-297.
  • KNIGHT, P.T. (2002). Summative Assessment in Higher Education: practices in disarray. Studies in higher Education. Vol. 27. nª3. 275-286.
  • LÓPEZ, V. et al. (2008). “Cerrando el círculo. Resultados recientes y últimos advances de la red nacional de evaluación formativa y compartida” En Cristina Guilarte Martín- Calero (Coord.), Innovación docente: Docencia y TICS (pp. 447-459) Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid
  • LÓPEZ, V. (coord.) (2009). La evaluación formativa y compartida en docencia universitaria: propuestas, técnicas, instrumentos y experiencias. Narcea. Madrid.
  • PÉREZ, M.P. (2008). Competencias adquiridas por los futuros docentes desde la formación inicial. Revista de Educación, 347.
  • SHARP, S. (2006). Deriving individual student marks from a tutor’s assessment of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (3), 14.
  • TARAS, N. (2005) Assessment – summative and formative – some theorical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53 (3), 446 – 478.
  • TROTTER, E. (2006). Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 31 (5), 16
  • WALSH, A. (2007). An exploration of Biggs’ constructive alignment in the context of work- based learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (1), 9.
  • WEAVER, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in higher Education. 31 (3). 15
  • ZABALZA, M.A. (2005) Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. Calidad y desarrollo profesional. Madrid: Narcea
Datuen iturria: Dialnet